Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque Yards, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla M, Velez Garcia-Nieto A great, Isla-Tejera B
90 days) involving the last browse date and also the full guide day. With this specific pointers, guides should consider requesting article writers off SRs so you’re able to change their literary works browse before the desired of your SRs. SR profiles must determine the amount of time lag between your last look date of your own product reviews so that the evidence are up-to-go out to have energetic systematic decision-and also make.
Recommendations
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G: Logical analysis from inside the healthcare an useful publication. Inside the. Cambridge: Cambridge School Push,; 2001: step one on line investment (148 p.).
Chalmers We. Chapter 24: using systematic ratings and you can information away from lingering examples having medical and you will moral demo framework, overseeing, and you will reporting. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Health-related recommendations from inside the healthcare : meta-research from inside the perspective. second ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper Nj, Jones DR. Facts synthesis since the key to significantly more defined and you will productive browse. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:30.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Is systematic studies right up-to-go out in the course of book? Syst Rev. 2013;2:thirty six.
Palese A great, Coletti S, Dante An excellent. Guide efficiency among high feeling foundation breastfeeding publications during 2009: a beneficial retrospective investigation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi Meters, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Most of scientific product reviews penned inside large-effect guides neglected to sign in the fresh new protocols: an excellent meta-epidemiological data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;sixty.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen Yards, Elo S, Kyngas H wife Naga. The latest methodological quality of clinical product reviews penned in large-feeling breastfeeding guides: a review of the fresh new literature. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(34):315thirty two.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Teaching devices within the evidence centered practice: analysis out-of reusable discovering things (RLOs) getting understanding meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2011;.
Shea Bj, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR are a reliable and you will appropriate measurement tool to evaluate the fresh methodological quality of clinical feedback. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski M, Vallve Odena M, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic A good, Jeric Meters, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak Yards, Poklepovic Pericic T, et al. Methodological and you will revealing quality of clinical studies published on highest positions journals in the area of aches. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The quality of health-related ratings in hand functions: an analysis having fun with AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Virtual assistant, Sharif MO. An AMSTAR research of your own methodological quality of systematic product reviews off dental healthcare treatments blogged in the record off used dental technology (JAOS). J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(5):440eight.
Clinical evaluations and you may meta-analyses to the psoriasis: part out of money provide, argument of great interest and you may bibliometric indices as the predictors regarding methodological quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):163349.
Brandt JS, Downing Air conditioning, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Pass classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the brand new 100 normally quoted diary articles over the last 50 years. Was J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e1seven.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di M, Tam WW, Tang J. Distribution and you will epidemiological functions out-of blogged personal patient data meta-analyses. PLoS You to definitely. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Approval off PRISMA report and you can top-notch clinical product reviews and you will meta-analyses had written inside medical periodicals: a corner-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Bj, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai An effective, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. External recognition away from a dimension equipment to assess health-related feedback (AMSTAR). PLoS That. 2007;2(12):e1350.